Module
Code and Title: RSP301 Undergraduate Research Project I
Programme(s): BSc
Environmental Management
Credit
Value: 24
Module
Tutor(s): Samir
Patel (Coordinator)
All
other environment faculty
General
objective(s) of the module:
RSP301
is the first part of a two-part year-long research course taught
alongside the conduct of individual student research projects. It is
intended to be half instructional and half guided independent study.
Within the research project, students will individually
conceptualize, design, implement, and analyse research. The
Undergraduate Research Project Is intended to build on and be a
culmination of the skills acquired through previous modules within
the programme. Students should have already gained field experience
and technical skills (statistics, GIS) previously. During the
project, students will gain research experience that will facilitate
future employment or future research in further studies. By means of
the final product, students are expected to show proficiency in both
the theory and practice of research. In the first part of the
research course, students will learn about what research means,
research methods, how to design a research project, and write an
individual research proposal along with a substantial literature
review. They will also learn about data collection, allowing them to
proceed with that phase of their research projects as soon as the
semester ends.
Learning
outcomes – Upon successful completion of the module, students will
be able to:
Describe
the characteristics of research.
Explain
a generalized overall research process.
Describe
the various types and categorizations of research.
Rationalize
the selection of specific research methods to address different
types of research questions.
Identify
an appropriate sub-field of research within Environmental Management
to begin a research project on.
Choose
a research question and formulate an applicable hypothesis.
Identify
and choose research methods appropriate for a particular project.
Plan
a research project relevant to the chosen subject area.
Explain
the merits of different sampling strategies.
Discuss
the relative advantages and applications of quantitative vs.
qualitative methods.
Analyse
published primary literature.
Select
and gather information from relevant large datasets / databases.
Compile
an annotated bibliography.
Write
a literature review on a specific topic within the chosen subject
area.
Write
a research proposal.
Present
and defend a research proposal.
Demonstrate
initial research skills related to subjects studied during the
earlier modules of the program.
Skills
to be developed:
Learning
and teaching approaches used:
The
module will be conducted over 15 teaching weeks as follows:
First
7 weeks:
Next
7 weeks:
3
hrs/wk of lecture
3
hrs/wk of primary literature reading and discussions
2
hrs/wk of small group guidance on individual project proposals
8
hrs/wk of independent study
Final
week:
Research
supervisors will be identified by the module coordinator from among
the Environmental Management faculty once students have finalized
their topic selections, based on a rough matching of topics with
faculty specializations. Approximately four faculty members in total
will handle student supervision for up to 10 projects each. These
faculty will be involved in the small group guidance time at the
latter half of the semester.
Assessment:
Semester-End
Examination (SE):30%
Continuous
Assessment (CA): 70%
CA
Assessment
|
Weight
|
Assessment
Detail
|
Annotated
Bibliography
|
5%
|
Week
5.
Annotated
bibliography with a minimum of 5 reference sources researched.
|
Draft
literature review
|
10%
|
Week
8.
Literature
review of 1500 words.
|
Draft
research design
|
10%
|
Week
11.
Research
paradigms to be employed along with justifications of their
applicability to the research question; objectives, outline of
methods for data collection and analysis; practical plan for
operationalizing the study; 2500 words.
|
Compiled
final research proposal
|
25%
|
Week
14.
A
complete research proposal with all requisite sections, commonly
found in a proposal (as per Zhib Tshol: RUB Research Policies);
4000 words.
|
Research
proposal presentation and defence
|
10%
|
Week
15.
Presentation
of 15 min and Q&A for 10 min.
|
Midterm
Exam
|
10%
|
|
Pre-requisite
knowledge:
EAP102 English for Academic Purposes II, IPS101 IT and Basic Problem
Solving, STS101 Applied Statistics
Subject
matter:
Understanding
research
What
is research?
Philosophy
of research
Experience/reasoning
vs. research
Deduction:
theory guides research
Induction:
theory is an outcome of research
Empiricism
Principles
of scientific inquiry; overview of scientific research
Overview
of the research process in the social sciences
Types
of research
Basic
vs. applied
Primary
vs. secondary
Based
on purpose: Exploratory, Descriptive, Correlative, Explanatory
Quantitative
vs. qualitative
Characteristics
of research
Overview
of the research process
Designing
a research project
Narrowing
in on a project: Research topics, research problems, research
purpose, research questions, hypotheses
Developing
the research question
Raising
research questions and developing testable hypotheses
Developing
research objectives and specific aims
Constructing
an appropriate research design
Sample
selection: considerations of size, representativeness, randomness,
level of significance obtainable, possibilities of bias
Types
of designs and their quantitative and qualitative tools and
implementations
Experimental
Cross-sectional
Longitudinal
Case
studies
Comparative
Reliability
and validity; controlling bias
Quantitative
methods
Overview,
measurement, and data management
Experimental
Characteristics
of experiments
Types
of experimental design
Experimental
validity
Descriptive
and correlational
Causation
and prediction
Data
collection and analysis
Review
of data management and analysis using SPSS
Qualitative
methods
Overview
and introduction to qualitative research
Measurement
and data collection
Designing
qualitative research and sampling
Broad
types of qualitative methods
Ethnography
Phenomenology
Case
studies
Textual
analysis
Applied
research
Qualitative
research tools (e.g. interviews, focus groups, observation)
Sources
of previously gathered data
Primary
literature; common literature search techniques and journal
collations
Online
published datasets and databases
Data
repositories, e.g. government archives, special library collections
Literature
Reviews and Research Proposals
Overview;
what is a research proposal and why write one
Parts
of a research proposal
Special
focus on: Purpose, features, and techniques for writing good
literature reviews
Select
topics in research ethics
Overview
of ethical considerations in research
Responsible
conduct of research
Protection
of research subjects
Ethics
approval and informed consent
Avoiding
biases, common errors in question formulation and data analysis
Avoiding
conflicts of interests
Essential
Readings:
AAAS:
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (n.d.).
Integrity in Scientific Research – Resource Guide.
http://www.aaas.org/spp/video/website.htm
Black,
T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An
integrated approach to research design, measurement, and statistics.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Bromage,
A. (2008). A brief note on research ethics. A page from the website
'Higher education resources', Birmingham: Higher education
resources. http://highereducationresources.atspace.com/ethics.htm
Burge,
S. (n.d.) Bias in Research.
http://familymed.uthscsa.edu/facultydevelopment/elearning/biasinresearch.htm
Danya
International, Inc. (2003). Formulating a research question.
http://www.theresearchassistant.com/tutorial/2.asp
Isaac,
W.L. (2009). Podcast on research ethics. Part I at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG1ymKBLCK8 and Part II at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV-1I8geHVU
Keifer-Boyd,
K. (2006). Formulating a research problem.
http://explorations.sva.psu.edu/lapland/LitRev/prob1.html
Kumar,
R. (2006). Research Methodology, 2nd Ed. Delhi: Dorling Kindersley
(Pearson).
NIAID:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (2010).
Laying the groundwork for your research plan.
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/researchfunding/newsletter/2010/pages/1027.aspx
Nuffield
Council on Bioethics. (2011). Ethical Issues.
http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/animal-research/animal-research-ethical-issues
Office
of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, US National Institutes
of Health. (n.d.). Qualitative Methods In Health Research:
Opportunities and Considerations In Application and Review.
http://obssr.od.nih.gov/pdf/Qualitative.pdf
Physioprof.
(2009). Structure Of An R01: Specific Aims.
http://scienceblogs.com/drugmonkey/2009/03/structure_of_an_r01_specific_a.php
RREE:
Resources for Research Ethics Education, University of California,
San Diego. (2010). http://research-ethics.net/
Steneck,
N. (2006). ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research.
Office of Research Integrity, US Department of Human and Health
Services. http://ori.dhhs.gov/education/products/RCRintro/index.html
Withen,
P. (2002). Outline on research instruments.
http://www2.uvawise.edu/pww8y/Resources/MERes/ResInstruments/00ResInstruments.html
Wong,
P. (n.d.). How to write a research proposal.
http://www.meaning.ca/archives/archive/art_how_to_write_P_Wong.htm
|